Nat Issues with ip virtual-reassembly

I got a question from one of my manager what are the pros and cons of ip virtual-reassembly.

Answer from of the blog I got

IOS throws that on automatically. Here’s what it does:

A buffer overflow attack can occur when an attacker continuously sends a large number of incomplete IP fragments, causing the firewall to lose time and memory while trying to reassemble the fake packets.

The max-reassemblies number option and the max-fragments number option allow you to configure maximum threshold values to avoid a buffer overflow attack and to control memory usage.

In addition to configuring the maximum threshold values, each IP datagram is associated with a managed timer. If the IP datagram does not receive all of the fragments within the specified time (which can be configured via the timeout seconds option), the timer will expire and the IP datagram (and all of its fragments) will be dropped.

Here’s why it does it:

VFR is designed to work with any feature that requires fragment reassembly (such as Cisco IOS Firewall and NAT). Currently, NAT enables and disables VFR internally; that is, when NAT is enabled on an interface, VFR is automatically enabled on that interface.

People who read this post also read :